Animal Experimentation Essays - Animal Welfare, Animal Testing

Animal Experimentation Essays - Animal Welfare, Animal Testing Animal Experimentation Use medicines that were tested on animals, or die? With the discovery of new medicines physicians, based on their research,we can predict the possible outcome or effect the medicine may possibly have. However, success is not guaranteed. Experiments must be done, but on whom? There is only a limited amount of reliable testers that scientist may use to conduct their experiments. Two of the most reliable testers include humans and animals. For many centuries scientists have experimented on animals, and it is still being done in order to maintain a healthier human population (Dixon). New medicines are being discovered throughout the year, and billions of lives are also beings saved thanks to the development of medicines discovered. Animals have helped our society grow and prosper. If it were not for them, the sick would not regain their health. Although many people do not agree with experimentation on animals, we should continue to test on animals in order to find a cure for diseases. From a baby to an adult, animal testing is used in everyday products (to the Pampers babies wear, to the Johnson and Johnson babies are washed with). In fact, there are an estimated 30 million animals used in experiments for our everyday products (?Update: Animal Testing?). According to Issues According to Thomas Dixon, the ?reduction of human suffering is our first priority and the prevention of animal suffering or death is secondary to that (although still important)? . Although animal testing is a good investment to our future, many people think of it as cruel and unusual punishment and are determined to put a stop to it. People like Thomas Dixon argue animals ?have the rights to be treated as beings of value in themselves, not as the means to human ends?. While some despise the idea of testing on animals, others urge animal experimentation to continue if it is the means to greater ends to human suffering. According to Cosmetics International, ?Certain [industries] have announced that they have stopped all animal testing, while others claim to be doing very little? (French say no). Not only are national cosmetic industries putting a stop to animal testing, but many animal right groups are also. Protesters claim that animal testing is a vile way to advance knowledge (?Animal Testing?). They also say that ?humans should treat animals with respect? (Update: Animal Testing). Even though people strongly disagree that animals are needed to be tested for the benefit of mankind, it is unavoidable. Despite the fact that some industries have put a stop to it to test their products, many scientists will still co ntinue to test on animals if the results will create a healthier life for all humans in the near future. Even though protesters argue that animals are not the only available option for testing, scientists disagree. According to most scientists, there is not a wide variety of substitutions to animal testing (?Update: Animal Testing?). Until there is an alternative to a possible tester, animals are our only option. Many people agree that the use of animals is lamentable but inevitable. There is a vast majority of societies that still continue to eat and wear animal products, including milk, eggs, meat, leather shoes, and belts (?Animal Testing?). Many of these individuals may not consider giving up these everyday products even if it means saving animals? lives, so why should there be a stop to animal testing if there is a

Freedom vs. Security essays

Freedom vs. Security essays On September 11th, 2001, an attack was made on The United States of America. Nineteen terrorists boarded and hijacked four passenger airlines, and used them as weapons against buildings in New York and Washington D.C. The fourth plane was brought down in rural Pennsylvania. Over 3,000 lives were lost in these attacks, and many more were ruined by the loss of family, friends, and coworkers. To prevent a reoccurrence of the events of 9-11-01, security policies have been changed, new measures taken, and national awareness heightened. However, new security measures have a tendency to take away some of our civil liberties as citizens of a democracy. This atrocity brought about a new debate within our nation and its leaders. Some say individual freedoms can be sacrificed for the sake of safety. Others strongly disagree and claim that is a disgrace to our constitution, history and country to take such measures. I agree with those who support heightened security, despite some of the constraints that may be placed on certain liberties. After the attacks of September 11th, soldiers of the National Guard have been on station in the airports across the nation. Soldiers pacing around an airport garbed in full battle gear, armed with automatic rifles is a new sight for most American citizens. However, if one were to travel to almost any other country in the world, (especially in Europe) this sight would be a common, everyday reality. This is something that we Americans should adjust to, for our own safety. Some believe that military presence in a civilian setting represents the characteristics of a socialist, communist, or totalitarian regime, and not that of a free democracy. This is not necessarily true; for freedom comes at a price. I dont mind if soldiers must be stationed on all means of public transit, including airports, if it means they are less likely to be attacked by terrorists, and prev ...